Close Menu
Global Macro NewsGlobal Macro News
  • Home
  • Global Economy
  • Markets
  • Geopolitics
  • Central Banks
  • Energy
  • Analysis
  • Daily Briefing
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Global Macro NewsGlobal Macro News
  • Home
  • Global Economy
  • Markets
  • Geopolitics
  • Central Banks
  • Energy
  • Analysis
  • Daily Briefing
Global Macro NewsGlobal Macro News
Home»Markets»Cocrystal Tech Says Kaneka Ubiquinol Patent Claims Were Invalidated
Markets

Cocrystal Tech Says Kaneka Ubiquinol Patent Claims Were Invalidated

Global Macro News DeskBy Global Macro News DeskSeptember 7, 2026No Comments2 Mins Read
Twitter Facebook Copy Link LinkedIn Telegram Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email

Cocrystal Technology (Jiaxing) Co. said a U.S. federal court invalidated two claims asserted by Kaneka Corp. in litigation involving the Kaneka ubiquinol patent and Cocrystal Tech’s CrysQnol ingredient. The company’s account of the ruling has not been independently verified.

In a company announcement dated Sept. 7, Cocrystal Tech said the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York entered summary judgment in its favor on Sept. 2 and closed the case, Kaneka Corp. v. Cocrystal Technology (Jiaxing) Co. Ltd. et al., No. 1:23-cv-07483.

Related reading
Trump Issues Labor Day Proclamation for 2026

Ruling Would Affect Kaneka Ubiquinol Patent Claims

According to Cocrystal Tech, the court found the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,829,080 failed utility and enablement requirements. Kaneka had alleged that Cocrystal Tech’s Crystal QH product, subsequently renamed CrysQnol, infringed the patent after filing the lawsuit in October 2023, Cocrystal Tech said.

The company said the asserted claims concerned reduced coenzyme Q10 compositions containing reduced coenzyme Q11. It said the decision, if confirmed, would allow it to continue making and selling CrysQnol in the United States without restrictions arising from the invalidated claims.

Cocrystal Tech also said it is moving its ubiquinol product branding from Crystal QH to CrysQnol while maintaining the same formulation and specifications. Kaneka had not been represented in the supplied material, and the court docket and order should be reviewed to confirm the status and scope of the Kaneka ubiquinol patent decision.

Previous ArticleBofA Sees Limited Novartis Impact From Pelacarsen Phase 3 Miss
Next Article Goldman Sachs Oil Targets Shift for Talos, Murphy, and APA
Avatar photo
Global Macro News Desk

Global Macro News Desk covers global economy, financial markets, central banks, geopolitics, energy, and macro risk. The desk focuses on clear, context-driven reporting and analysis for readers following the forces shaping global markets. [email protected]

Related Posts

BNG Lending Growth Reaches €7.3 Billion in First Half

September 7, 2026

YPF Debt Tender Offers Target Up to $500 Million

September 7, 2026

BofA Sees Limited Novartis Impact From Pelacarsen Phase 3 Miss

September 7, 2026
Add A Comment
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Trending Now

Papua LNG Advances Toward Investment Decision

September 8, 2026

Trump Calls for Possible Limits on Bombardier U.S. Sales

September 7, 2026

BNG Lending Growth Reaches €7.3 Billion in First Half

September 7, 2026

YPF Debt Tender Offers Target Up to $500 Million

September 7, 2026

Goldman Sachs Oil Targets Shift for Talos, Murphy, and APA

September 7, 2026

Global Macro News covers global markets, central banks, geopolitics, energy and macroeconomic developments with clear, context-driven reporting and analysis.

[email protected]

SECTIONS
  • Markets
  • Analysis
  • Geopolitics
  • Global Economy
  • Central Banks
  • Trade
  • Energy
ABOUT
  • About
  • Editorial Policy
  • Contact
© 2026 Global Macro News. All rights reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Disclaimer

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.